data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bc14/3bc143ac77ab1f533337bab896f58624384df3e1" alt="NJSF.KingJohn.1a"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faacc/faacc8f36cd2a778fcef93e553dba77f3bbfd35b" alt="NJSF.King.John.Queen.Phillip"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7636/c7636ea2fbf95d5937f3f4055c67fa5ea9c82d0f" alt="NJSF.King.John.Phillip"
Excerpts from the reviews
“‘King John’ is not a self-generated Shakespearean creation but a slapdash rewrite of an earlier anonymous script. The erratic and unworthy John makes an unsatisfactory protagonist, and the colorful secondary characters fail to buttress the sagging center. Only so idealistic a theatre would attempt so problematic a play . . . Although flashes of insight and excitement flicker from the Festival’s . . . stage, Barry’s epic sprint comes to a depressing end . . . Talented T. Ryder Smith gives an impish spin to the play’s zestiest character, the bastard Faulconbridge . . . His piratical squint and sinister dash emphasizes the character’s mercurial perversity at the expense of his moral maturing. It’s an entertaining flight that never quite lights on solid ground.“ – Bob Campbell, The Newark Star-Ledger
“An outsized throne and a humongous blood-red robe trimmed in ermine are the dominant images of the New Jersey Shakespeare Festival’s ‘King John’. Thus director Paul Barry completes the Shakesperean canon, with a portrait of a king far too small for his role in history. Barry is able to solve some of this play’s well-known problems while succumbing to others . . ” – Leslie Hoban Blake, The Shakespeare Bulletin
[previous] [next]